The U.S. Constitution
Archival records, profiles, and educational resources since 1995.

Can Minnesota Ban “Nudify” Apps?
Everyone has a vague, comforting instinct that the First Amendment means the government cannot ban “expression.” And then a legislature passes a law aimed at a specific kind of digital output: non-consensual sexualized images that make real people appear nude. That is the collision we are watching...
Read more →
Judge Bars Alleged Retaliation Against an ICE Watcher
A federal judge in Ohio has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) aimed at a narrow but fundamental constitutional principle: government officials cannot use intimidation or retaliation to punish someone for protected speech. The case involves Sean Moorman, a volunteer “ICE watcher” who...
Read more →
Menendez Brothers Parole Hearing Set for March 2027: What Changes
You can tell a story has gone viral when a single date starts doing all the work. In this case, the date is March 2027 . That month has been described publicly as the newly scheduled window for the next parole suitability hearing for Lyle and Erik Menendez . If you are looking for something...
Read more →
Can a President Put a Columbus Statue at the White House?
When a president says a statue of Christopher Columbus “stands at the entrance” to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, right next to the White House complex, the obvious question is simple: can a president do that? The constitutional answer is less cinematic than people expect. The President...
Read more →
The Mail-In Ballot Case at the Supreme Court, Explained
Mail-in ballots feel like a modern controversy, but the legal fight is older than the pandemic and bigger than any one candidate. It is a recurring clash between two ideas that both sound like democracy: making voting accessible, and making voting verifiable. This explainer focuses on why mail...
Read more →
Raskin, Trump, and the Third Impeachment Question
Impeachment is one of those constitutional words that sounds like a verdict. But in American law, it is closer to an indictment: a formal accusation issued by the House, followed by a trial in the Senate. That distinction is the key to understanding why Rep. Jamie Raskin’s September 6, 2026...
Read more →
When AI-Generated CSAM Meets the First Amendment
You can feel the moral impulse immediately: if an image depicts the sexual abuse of a child, it should be illegal to make, to possess, to share. Full stop. But American constitutional law does not run on moral certainty. It runs on categories, definitions, and lines that courts draw so the...
Read more →
Arizona’s Voter Rolls Case Heads to the Supreme Court
Most election fights sound like they are about politics. This one is about plumbing. Not the dramatic question of who wins, but the quiet machinery underneath: who is allowed onto the voter rolls in the first place, who can be taken off, and when a state is permitted to fix its own list. This...
Read more →
Can Congress Force the FBI to Turn Over Documents?
When a member of Congress “demands” FBI documents, it can sound like a simple hierarchy: lawmakers ask, agencies comply. The Constitution does not work that way. It sets up separate branches with overlapping powers, and then it forces them to argue until something gives. The current dispute...
Read more →
Arizona Voter Law at the Supreme Court: Proof of Citizenship and Voter Rolls
You can feel the tension in this case without knowing a single statute number: states administer elections, but federal law keeps showing up with a clipboard. What case are we talking about? This explainer is about Mi Familia Vota v. Fontes , a challenge to parts of Arizona’s election system that...
Read more →
ICE Detention and Bond Hearings: What Due Process Requires
Immigration detention is one of the most visible places in American law where the government can hold a person for months without ever filing a criminal charge. That is not because the Constitution stops applying at the border or inside an ICE facility. It is because immigration detention is...
Read more →
Supreme Court and Redistricting
When a congressional map is challenged close to an election, the dispute can look like pure politics. But the legal question underneath it is older than any modern redistricting cycle: who, exactly, is allowed to draw the lines that decide who votes for which member of Congress? That question is...
Read more →
Non-Citizen Voting Arrests: What Federal Law and the Constitution Say
Arrest video tied to alleged non-citizen voting has a way of triggering the same argument on repeat: one side insists it is widespread, the other insists it is impossible. The Constitution does not settle the debate as neatly as either side suggests. It does not contain a single sentence that...
Read more →
Pentagon Leadership Shake-Ups and Presidential Power
The Constitution gives the president a title that sounds absolute: Commander in Chief . In moments of Pentagon turmoil, that phrase can get treated like a blank check, as if the White House can rearrange the entire national security bureaucracy at will, instantly, and without consequence. But the...
Read more →
Concealed Carry Across State Lines
Try this on for size: you can invoke the First Amendment in any state, demand due process in any state, and refuse an unreasonable search in any state. But if you want to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense and you cross an invisible line on the highway, your legal status can go from...
Read more →
DHS Pushes ICE to Pre-Dismiss Weak Asylum Claims
DHS has told its courtroom lawyers to move faster in a specific way: file early motions asking immigration judges to deny asylum applications that government attorneys believe are legally insufficient on their face. Under new Trump administration guidance, ICE attorneys are being directed to raise...
Read more →
Can a President Force Lower Interest Rates or Stop Trade?
Presidents talk about interest rates and trade the way coaches talk about the refs: as if a little pressure and a louder voice might change the outcome. The Constitution does not run on vibes. It runs on separated powers, delegated statutes, and a financial system deliberately built to resist...
Read more →
Why North Carolina’s Supreme Court Blocked a Congressional Map Before the Midterms
When a state supreme court blocks a congressional map weeks before a midterm election, it feels like the judiciary is stepping onto the field in the fourth quarter. But in American election law, that is often exactly when courts show up, because that is when deadlines turn legal theories into...
Read more →
Birthright Citizenship and the 14th Amendment: Can a President End It by Executive Order?
Birthright citizenship is one of those constitutional ideas that sounds simple until someone tries to change it in real time. A recurring flashpoint is when a president issues (or proposes) an executive order aimed at narrowing who counts as a citizen at birth, and a federal court quickly blocks it...
Read more →
Hung Juries and the Lindsay Clancy Trial
A criminal jury’s job is deceptively simple on paper: listen, weigh credibility, apply the law as instructed, and return a verdict. In real life, that last step can become the hardest one, because the American jury is built to require something rare in modern civic life: unanimity. That design is...
Read more →