Loading …Discussion
Why feed him and care for him for years? More taxpayers money wasted. I suppose he could or should be in danger in prison, YES.
The libs and their 'justice' system at it again! Coulda set an example with the death penalty, but nope—just happy to keep feeding criminals for life. More taxpayer dollars down the drain! This is why our country needs Trump back to fix these weak policies!
Why do you think the death penalty would've been more effective than life sentences here?
Why feed him, clothe him, give him a tv in his cell,medical care,a computer to play with, free board. The scriptures are not wrong! “An eye for an eye, life for a life…..There is no social redeeming value for keeping that man alive.
Couldn't agree more, we need strong leadership to fix this mess!
Hardened criminals don't deserve a cushy night at Hotel Royal. It costs more to house, feed, provide medical assistance than it does to eliminate them at the onset of their conviction by their peers.
Swapping a death sentence for life? Sounds like soft Dem justice to me. The guy admits to killing FOUR students, but we're supposed to let him sit comfortably alive in jail? Where's the harsh punishment? This kinda "deal" is part of why our justice system's a joke! MAGA!
Absolutely agree! Life in prison doesn't seem harsh enough for taking four young lives. It's frustrating how justice seems to be going soft these days. We need to uphold tougher consequences to truly maintain law and order.
Looks like once again we're choosing to let criminals off easy, huh? Death penalty's there for a reason, but somehow it's always the wrong folks making deals. Maybe if the judicial system wasn't so soft, we'd see real justice. Another reason why we need Trump back!
Democrats want criminals coddled not punished! Justice means consequences, not legal loopholes!
It's unsettling how the justice system sometimes trades eternal justice for a quick resolution. While I'm glad the families have closure, I can't help but wonder if we're losing something by forgoing trials. Back in the day, justice meant a trial by jury… Still, one less monster roaming is a good thing.
Justice must balance consequence with compassion, even in dark times like these.
This is why our justice system is broken. We traded real justice for a plea and let this monster live on taxpayers’ money forever. The Dems always pushing for less accountability, it’s like they care more about criminals than victims. So much for a fair system, huh?
Another joke of the justice system! Trading a death sentence for a guilty plea is just a slap on the wrist. Dems are destroying law and order, making it easy for criminals. If we had Trump in charge, this wouldn't happen! Weak justice, fueled by fake news and liberal madness!
The decision in Idaho highlights a real catch-22 in our justice system. As someone who believes in the Constitution, it's perplexing that we rely so heavily on the death penalty as a bargaining chip. Think about it—justice shouldn't be about who blinks first. It's concerning that our criminal system requires such drastic measures to reach a resolution. The whole plea deal situation denies us the full narrative a trial would provide. Sure, it spares the family more pain, but it leaves many of us with unanswered questions. When did we start sacrificing the pursuit of truth for convenience?
Why we lettin' these murderers off easy? Why'd Idaho back down to begin with? We need tougher justice, not this weak deal-making. Goes to show how broken the system is. Bet the Dems are all for letting him off easy—another reason we need strong leaders like Trump!
SAVES $ AND SENDS A MESSAGE, AMD IS ACTUALLY MORE HUMANE THAN LETTING HIM ROT IN PRISON. IF ALLOWED TO LIVE HE SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO WORK AND PAY FOR HIS FOOD, CLOTHING, AND SHELTER, EVERY DAY EXCEPT SUNDAY.
This insanity is why there is no deterrent in the act of committing the murder of anyone of us. The worse punishment for the cold blooded killer is living their miserable pitiful lives being cared for by the American peoples money, Free housing,food three times a day, recreational time, medical care for free, free visitation by loved ones, and the accumulation of personal wealth. Why? Or perhaps they get found not guilty. Where is the Justice for the heinous Crimes that these SCUM commit? NONE
IF it's obvious who the mass murderer is, why waste the court's valuable time & money?! Sure everyone has the right to face their accusers however, most, if not all mass murderers, never give their victims a second thought for their situation. Their actions are vile & lacking compassion towards the vic, including the suffering & pain they cause them. Give them the impression a deal can be made, then after their testimony is made, rescind on the deal & prosecute with extreme prejudice.
It will just be a matter of time before he is brutally killed very slowly in prison as he should be.
In prison Kohberger will get what is coming to him.
Death penalties always cost way more than life sentences. Going to trial allows for a not-guilty result- remember "if it fits you must convict" resulting in an acquittal of OJ Simpson. In the event of a conviction, there will be appeal after appeal with the government housing him while paying for most of the legal costs and probably for decades. All that time there's a chance the death penalty will be suspended. Better to have a guaranteed conviction at lower cost.
THE MURDERS PARENTS MAY NOT HAVE PLAYED A ROLE IN HOW THIS PERSON WOUND UP THE WAY HE IS. BUT THE MURDERER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HE HAS DONE. CONSEQUENCES. THEREFORE GUILTY AS CHARGED, DEATH PENALTY UNLESS BY THE GRACE OF GOD SOMETHING AMAZING CHANGES…
Until such time as our justice system actually punishes with a severe enough punishment that criminals will fear the penalty doing the crime, we will never again have a true justice system.
Leave a Comment
A Guilty Plea, a Life Spared, and the Reality of American Justice
The case that horrified and captivated the nation has reached its legal conclusion. Bryan Kohberger, the former criminology Ph.D. student, has pleaded guilty to the murders of four University of Idaho students. In doing so, he has accepted four consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole, and the state has withdrawn its intent to seek the death penalty.
For the families of Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Kaylee Goncalves, this plea provides a measure of finality—a guarantee that the man responsible will never again walk free. But for the nation, this outcome is a powerful and unsettling illustration of the pragmatic, often wrenching, compromises at the heart of the American criminal justice system.
It is a moment that trades the public spectacle of a trial and the possibility of ultimate retribution for the cold, hard certainty of a conviction.
The Shadow of the Eighth Amendment
This entire plea agreement exists because of the death penalty. Capital punishment, permitted under the Constitution but limited by the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishments,” is more than just a sentence.
It is the single most powerful piece of leverage a prosecutor holds. The threat of execution is what brings a defendant, even one who has maintained innocence for years, to the bargaining table.
It forces a stark choice: waive your Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial or risk paying with your life.
This case becomes a textbook example of that dynamic. The state, armed with DNA evidence from a knife sheath, cellphone data, and surveillance footage, had a strong case.
Yet, the immense cost, years of mandatory appeals, and the emotional toll of a capital trial on the victims’ families made the certainty of a plea deal a more practical path. This is the calculus that drives our justice system, where the abstract pursuit of ultimate justice often gives way to the practical need for a guaranteed outcome.
A Trial Forfeited, A “Why” Unanswered
A plea bargain achieves legal closure, but it often comes at the price of public understanding. A trial is a form of public storytelling; it forces the prosecution to weave evidence into a coherent narrative, explaining not just what happened, but how and why. It allows for the cross-examination of witnesses and the testing of evidence in the crucible of an open courtroom.
By pleading guilty, Kohberger has forfeited that public process. The nation may now have its answer to “who,” but it is left with an enduring and haunting silence on the question of “why.” The motive behind this horrific act, which a trial might have illuminated, may now remain locked away forever.
This is a fundamental trade-off in our system.
We secure the certainty of punishment but often sacrifice the public reckoning that a trial provides, leaving a void that the legal system is not designed to fill.
The Reality of American Justice
While this case was extraordinary in its brutality and the national attention it commanded, its conclusion is profoundly ordinary. More than 95% of all criminal convictions in the United States are the result of a plea bargain, not a jury trial.
Our constitutional system, with its robust protections for defendants, has evolved into a system that heavily incentivizes defendants to waive those rights in exchange for a lesser sentence.
The Kohberger case is a stark reminder that our system of justice is not always about revealing the whole truth or achieving perfect, righteous retribution. It is a human institution, designed to navigate profound tragedy through a series of difficult, imperfect, and often necessary compromises.
The finality of the sentence is the system’s pragmatic success; the lingering silence is its inherent price. For the families and the community, the search for a different kind of peace, one that the courts cannot provide, now begins.
This whole situation reeks of the ridiculousness that's become of our justice system. Kohberger should've been given the death penalty swift and clear-cut justice! But instead, they're bending over backwards to strike deals? It's all political nonsense. This wouldn't have happened if we had stronger leaders like Trump still in charge. The left's so-called compassion only weakens us! Remember folks, trials are there to reveal the truth and here we are with no understanding of the "why." We need accountability not handshakes in backrooms. Enough of this soft approach; time to bring back real justice! MAGA all the way!! 🇺🇸