Seattle Shifts Course on Police Funding
Seattle’s city council has unanimously approved Resolution 32167, abandoning prior commitments to defund police. This marks a significant shift in the city’s public safety policies. Councilmember Rob Saka emphasized that this move is about “collectively healing” from what he describes as the “shameful legacy of ‘Defund’.” The city is now moving towards a more diversified response model, as requested by Seattle’s communities.
Saka, who is Black, pointed out the irony that prior decisions to defund were made without any Black members on the council. He argued this left many communities feeling sidelined and that no real benefits emerged for these communities from the “Defund” movement.
This shift responds to reported crime increases in several cities and the realization that past council pledges were divisive. The anti-police atmosphere influenced officer departures, with many citing it as a reason for leaving.
With the resolution’s approval, Seattle’s City Attorney will submit the remaining police department policies for federal review, a crucial step in winding down the broader oversight under which Seattle police have been operating.

Shifting Political Dynamics and Future Implications
Resolution 32167 highlights the shifting political dynamics within historically liberal bastions like Seattle. While the “Defund the Police” movement initially aimed to address systemic inequalities, it became polarizing amid rising crime rates. This has prompted city officials, even in Democratic strongholds, to recalibrate their strategies.
Saka’s rhetoric reflects an understanding of the complexities involved, pointing to the absence of Black voices in the original decision-making process as a significant gap. This omission underscores the need for a reflective approach that considers diverse perspectives from the communities most affected by such policies.
As Seattle transitions from its former stance, the conversation pivots to what lies ahead. This development raises important questions about the future of policing in America and the constitutional principles guiding our republic. How can city governments, within the framework set by our founding fathers, innovate in ways that uphold individual liberties while ensuring security? As Seattle redefines its approach, it serves as both a case study and a benchmark for other jurisdictions addressing these challenging issues.

Impact on Public Safety and Community Relations
Resolution 32167 focuses on reshaping public safety strategies through a diversified response model. The aim is to blend traditional policing with community-informed methods that address safety needs more comprehensively. This approach advocates for integrating mental health resources, social services, and alternative crisis responses into the security framework.
Saka’s remarks highlighted the exclusion of Black community perspectives during the 2020 defund debates. This oversight underscores a broader issue: the potential misalignment between policy decisions and the real interests of those most affected. Effective public safety reform requires genuine input from the communities it seeks to serve, not merely rhetoric imposed from above.
The resolution provides an opportunity to rebuild trust between law enforcement and communities. Yet, doing so necessitates a commitment to transparent dialogue and authentic engagement with diverse voices. As Seattle embarks on this path, it calls into focus whether such recalibration can genuinely address the failures of past policies and foster a secure yet equitable environment.
How can municipalities uphold both order and justice without leaning into authoritarian assumptions? And how might diverse community inputs innovate safety paradigms that align more closely with foundational constitutional values? As the resolution unfolds in practice, it will serve as both a reflection point for Seattle and a potential blueprint for cities nationwide looking to mend the rift between law enforcement and civic life.
- Best C. Black in Blue: Lessons on Leadership, Breaking Barriers, and Racial Reconciliation. HarperCollins Leadership; 2021.