Unexpected Security Breach: Jeffrey Goldberg Inadvertently Added to Sensitive Military Chat
In a shocking turn of events, Jeffrey Goldberg, Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic, found himself accidentally included in a sensitive Signal chat discussing military strategies for targeting the Houthis in Yemen. This communication mishap involved 18 high-ranking officials, including:
- Vice President JD Vance
- National Security Adviser Michael Waltz
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
- White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles
- Trump adviser Stephen Miller
Goldberg’s unexpected involvement began on March 11 when he accepted a Signal connection request he believed was from Michael Waltz. Two days later, he was added to a chat labeled “Houthi PC small group,” where military strategies were being discussed. Initially skeptical, Goldberg thought it might be a hoax or an attempt to embarrass him.
The National Security Council confirmed the authenticity of the message thread, raising serious concerns about the breach. An investigation is now underway to determine how Goldberg’s number was included in the group.
President Trump downplayed the incident, attributing it to a mistake by one of Waltz’s aides and expressing continued confidence in his team. However, the slip-up has invited scrutiny from national security experts and political opponents.
"If true, this story represents one of the most egregious failures of operational security and common sense I have ever seen," said Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
John Bolton, a former national security adviser, questioned the use of Signal for such discussions, emphasizing the importance of secure locations like the White House Situation Room. Mietek Boduszyลski, a former U.S. diplomat, described it as an unusual incident that revealed typically classified decision-making processes.
Democratic leaders called for accountability and an investigation into what they termed a significant security lapse. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and California Rep. Eric Swalwell advocated for disciplinary actions to prevent future risks to national security.
Trump Administration Responds to Signal Chat Mishap
President Trump addressed the mishap involving Jeffrey Goldberg’s accidental inclusion in the Signal group chat, labeling it a mere “glitch” in his administration’s otherwise efficient operation. Trump maintained confidence in National Security Adviser Mike Waltz and emphasized the successful outcome of the military action in Yemen.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed Trump’s sentiments, stating:
"No classified information was compromised and President Trump continues to have the utmost confidence in his national security team, including National Security Adviser Mike Waltz."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth denied that any sensitive war plans were shared in the group chat, dismissing concerns about the incident. He told reporters, “Nobody was texting war plans, and that’s all I have to say about that.”
However, former National Security Adviser John Bolton expressed skepticism about using Signal for high-stakes discussions, highlighting the importance of secure facilities like the Situation Room for such sensitive matters.
This incident serves as a reminder of the need for robust operational security in our constitutional republic. As the situation unfolds, it will likely prompt further discussion about security protocols within the current administration.
Democratic Leaders Call for Investigation and Accountability
Democratic leaders have called for a thorough investigation and accountability following the security breach involving Jeffrey Goldberg’s accidental inclusion in a Signal chat about military operations. The incident has sparked intense criticism and demands for action:
- Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer described the incident as a “stunning failure of operational security” and urged a detailed inquiry to prevent future mishaps.
- House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries characterized the breach as “completely outrageous” and called for bipartisan collaboration to scrutinize the incident.
- Eric Swalwell, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, advocated for revoking security clearances of those involved.
- Elizabeth Warren expressed concern about the administration’s handling of sensitive military information, describing the situation as “blatantly illegal and dangerous beyond belief.”
These demands for accountability reflect broader Democratic apprehensions about the current administration’s information security protocols. The incident has exposed vulnerabilities in government communication practices and sparked debate over appropriate channels for discussing matters of national importance.
Key questions raised by this security breach include:
- How might this incident impact future discussions about balancing technological convenience with the need for secure communications in our constitutional republic?
- What steps should be taken to ensure that sensitive military information remains protected while allowing for efficient decision-making processes?
As the investigation unfolds, it is clear that this security lapse will have far-reaching implications for national security protocols and political discourse in the coming months.
-
1. Goldberg J. U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn't think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling. The Atlantic. March 18, 2024.
2. National Security Council. Statement on Signal group chat incident. March 18, 2024.
3. Trump D. Interview with NBC News. March 19, 2024.
4. Leavitt K. White House Press Secretary statement on Signal chat incident. March 18, 2024.
5. Bolton J. Interview on CNN. March 18, 2024.
6. Boduszyลski M. Statement on U.S. foreign policy decision-making process. March 18, 2024.
7. Jeffries H. Statement on national security information leak. March 18, 2024.
8. Swalwell E. Post on X (formerly Twitter). March 18, 2024.
9. Schumer C. Post on X (formerly Twitter). March 18, 2024.