DOGE Takes Over: A New Era in Federal Government
Merici Vinton's experience at the US Digital Service (USDS) changed dramatically with the arrival of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk. Vinton described the new era as "highly secretive" with a shift away from collaboration and consensus-building. DOGE implemented what she calls a "bulldozer-like approach," making quick decisions without apparent regard for established federal processes.
Vinton observed new staffers joining federal operations who seemed to lack understanding of the system. She emphasized their "careless disregard" for the intricacies of government work, contrasting sharply with previous approaches.
The sudden rebranding of USDS on Trump's Inauguration Day led to significant changes:
- DOGE representatives conducted quick interviews
- Unusual questions about employees' exceptional qualities
- Inquiries about favorite colleagues
Vinton's departure became inevitable when USDS closed and DOGE took over. She described the environment as "a bit like a funeral." The mass firing of 43 employees on a February evening marked a farewell to her chapter in government service.
Throughout this shift, Vinton maintained an apolitical stance, focusing on the mission and impact of her work. Her account serves as a warning about the potential long-term implications of DOGE's methods on government service delivery.
The Transformation and Its Consequences
The transformation of USDS into DOGE marked a significant shift in federal agency operations. The new approach focused on rapid downsizing and restructuring, replacing collaborative problem-solving. The layoffs and resignations at USDS created an atmosphere Vinton likened to a "funeral."
DOGE's approach included:
- Expedited interviews with existing employees
- Unconventional questions seemingly irrelevant to federal work competencies
- Cultural upheaval triggering resignations
The mass firing of probationary employees, recruited for their specialized skills, raised concerns about federal agency efficacy and morale. Vinton worried that many of these technical experts might never return to public service.
How will federal agencies adapt to this new paradigm that prioritizes expediency over careful deliberation?
As we reflect on the founding principles, how does this evolving government structure align with the republic envisioned by the Constitution's framers?
Long-term Implications and Constitutional Concerns
The broader implications of DOGE's approach extend beyond immediate impacts on agencies like USDS. Vinton's account highlights a potential long-term weakening of the federal workforce's ability to meet public needs. The hasty execution has sidelined valuable talent, creating expertise gaps that may be challenging to fill.
The specialized skills necessary for efficiently managing government systems are not easily replaceable. This brain drain affects both immediate operations and future efforts to serve the American public effectively.
Adding to the complexity is the lack of clear leadership within DOGE. Vinton noted uncertainty about who is steering the day-to-day agenda, potentially hampering strategic, cohesive actions that align with the broader mission of public service.
These changes raise questions about the government's capacity to deliver crucial services without sacrificing quality and reliability. As efforts to streamline operations continue, how can we ensure that the spirit of our constitutional republic persists?
The vision set forth by the Constitution's framers serves as a guide in addressing these challenges. How can we reconcile the drive for efficiency with the enduring values of public service? What oversight and adaptation will be necessary to maintain the integrity of governance while embracing necessary reforms?
- Musk E. Fork in the Road email to federal employees. Office of Personnel Management. January 28, 2025.
- Trump D. Executive Order on Reducing the Size of the Federal Workforce. The White House. April 11, 2025.
- Government Accountability Office. Information Technology: Critical Actions Needed to Address Longstanding Management Challenges. Washington, DC: GAO; April 2025.