This isn’t just a political question — it’s a constitutional one. The 10th Amendment reserves powers not granted to the federal government for the states and the people. That includes decisions about law enforcement, public safety, and how to handle emergencies.

But in times of crisis, presidents have claimed sweeping authority to intervene — sometimes without state approval. When that happens, are your rights safer in the hands of federal officials hundreds of miles away, or with the leaders you elected locally?

 Loading …

The Founders designed a system that split power on purpose — to keep tyranny in check. But when chaos erupts, and one level of government overrides another, we all have to ask: who’s really standing up for your freedom? Would you rather risk delayed action — or unchecked power? Click to vote and see how America is answering.