USConstitution.net 2007 Survey Results
This site has conducted an unscientific survey on various issues since July
of 1998. The results, while interesting in most cases, are to be taken with a
grain of salt – the results can easily be skewed by an individual or group of
individuals; the sample is, by nature, not representative (because it consists
only of Web users who visit my site and bother to view the survey page and
submit an opinion).
This page includes results from 2007. For results from other years, please
go to the Main Results Page.
Question 113 (December 2007): With the first primaries and
caucuses right around the corner, it is time for our first Presidential straw
poll. Which candidate would you vote for to run for President if you were asked
to vote today?
Response | Count | % Total | % In Party |
---|---|---|---|
Democrats | |||
Joe Biden | 48 | 1.79 | 5.72 |
Hillary Clinton | 250 | 9.35 | 29.80 |
Chris Dodd | 10 | 0.37 | 1.19 |
John Edwards | 106 | 3.96 | 12.63 |
Mike Gravel | 9 | 0.34 | 1.07 |
Dennis Kucinich | 89 | 3.33 | 10.61 |
Barak Obama | 297 | 11.10 | 35.40 |
Bill Richardson | 30 | 1.12 | 3.58 |
Republicans | |||
Rudy Giuliani | 103 | 3.85 | 6.28 |
Mike Huckabee | 241 | 9.01 | 14.70 |
Duncan Hunter | 22 | 0.82 | 1.34 |
Alan Keyes | Due to an oversight, Keyes was not included in the straw poll. | ||
John McCain | 85 | 3.18 | 5.19 |
Ron Paul | 877 | 32.79 | 53.51 |
Mitt Romney | 175 | 6.54 | 10.68 |
Tom Tancredo | 8 | 0.30 | 0.49 |
Fred Thompson | 128 | 4.79 | 7.81 |
Constitution | |||
Don Grundman | 8 | 0.30 | 61.54 |
Diane Beall Templin | 5 | 0.19 | 38.46 |
Green | |||
Jared Ball | 0 | — | — |
Elaine Brown | 1 | 0.04 | 5.55 |
Paul Kangas | 1 | 0.04 | 5.55 |
Jerry Kann | 0 | — | — |
Cynthia McKinney | 4 | 0.15 | 2.22 |
Kent Mesplay | 1 | 0.04 | 5.55 |
Gail Parker | 0 | — | — |
“Average Joe” Schriner | 11 | 0.41 | 61.11 |
Kat Swift | 0 | — | — |
Libertarian | |||
Jim Burns | 2 | 0.07 | 14.29 |
Dave Hollist | 0 | — | — |
Dan Imperato | 1 | 0.04 | 7.14 |
Bob Jackson | 4 | 0.15 | 28.58 |
Mike Jingozian | 1 | 0.04 | 7.14 |
Steve Kubby | 1 | 0.04 | 7.14 |
Alden Link | 1 | 0.04 | 7.14 |
Robert Milnes | 3 | 0.11 | 21.43 |
George Phillies | 1 | 0.04 | 7.14 |
Prohibition | |||
Greg Amondson | 2 | 0.07 | 28.57 |
Leroy Pletten | 5 | 0.19 | 71.43 |
Socialist | |||
Stewart Alexander | 46 | 1.72 | 52.87 |
Brian Moore | 41 | 1.53 | 47.13 |
Other | |||
None of the Above | 49 | 1.83 | — |
Total | 2675 | 100.00 | — |
Question 112 (November 2007): On November 3, 2007,
Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf declared martial law, suspended
the constitution, and invoked emergency powers across the country. This move
follows the return of popular opposition figure Benazir Bhutto and associated
unrest and terrorist acts. Additionally, when the Pakistani Supreme Court
refused to endorse the emergency measures, he dismissed the Supreme Court. What
should the U.S. response be?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
The U.S. has no business butting into Pakistan’s internal affairs. Pakistan is a key ally in the war on terror and we need their full cooperation – now’s no time to rock the boat. |
117 | 31.62 |
We believe in the supremacy of the law, and we should seek allies who agree with that principle. We need to pressure Musharraf to end martial law quickly and work with him to restore order. |
105 | 28.38 |
Pakistan differs from North Korea only in its rhetoric – we should cut them off just as we have North Korea, at least until free and fair elections are held. |
60 | 16.22 |
I don’t really care about Pakistan. | 88 | 23.78 |
Total | 840 | 100.00 |
Question 111 (October 2007): [Note: this survey ran until
November 7] In March 2007, a federal appeals court struck down a highly
restrictive set of gun laws in Washington DC. The laws, in general, restrict
private ownership of guns within the district. The city defended the law by
saying that the protections of the 2nd Amendment
applied to state militas only. The District appealed the ruling to the Supreme
Court, which is scheduled to hear the case in its current term. This could be
the most significant gun case to reach the Court in over 70 years. What are
your feelings about regulation of gun ownership?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
States should be able to regulate guns in any way they wish, from complete bans to unfettered access. |
100 | 11.90 |
The 2nd Amendment should be incorporated as a protected “privilege or immunity”, but the point of the 2nd was to protect militias from government interference, so private ownership can still be banned. |
71 | 8.45 |
The 2nd Amendment should be incorporated as a protected “privilege or immunity”, and the point of the 2nd was to protect individual ownership, so the Court should use this opportunity to overturn all restrictive gun laws. |
562 | 66.90 |
Regardless, the 2nd is an anachronism. It should be replaced with a new constitutional amendment that is written by and for a modern citizenry. |
107 | 12.74 |
Total | 840 | 100.00 |
Question 110 (September 2007): New Hampshire has held the
honor of holding the first primary in the nation each presidential cycle since
the 1950’s, an honor its law requires it maintain. Iowa’s caucus, typically
held a week before New Hampshire’s primary, has been a “first hurdle” since the
1970’s. More and more states are jockeying for a position in the early process,
and are moving their primaries into January, which could cause New Hampshire to
move its primary into December. Is the current primary system healthy?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
New Hampshire and Iowa got there first, and they should be able to maintain their first-in-the-nation status. |
24 | 10.26 |
All states should hold their primaries on the same day, just like the final elections. |
90 | 38.46 |
The country should be divided into geographic regions, and the primaries in each region should be held a few weeks apart. Each cycle, a new region could be first. |
47 | 20.09 |
The country should be divided into classes of roughly the same number of electoral votes, and each cycle, a new class gets to go first, with the others following a few weeks behind, one class at a time. |
23 | 9.83 |
The parties and states should be allowed to do whatever they want – New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation law is stupid and should be repealed. |
50 | 21.37 |
Total | 234 | 100.00 |
Question 109 (August 2007): Criticism of Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales, from both Democrats and Republicans, is mounting. The
President, however, is resolute in his support for Gonzales. What would you
like to see happen? Note: Gonzales announced his resignation on
08/27/2007.
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Nothing – the President is doing exactly the right thing standing by his AG. |
108 | 22.41 |
The President should see the light and fire Gonzales |
75 | 15.56 |
The Congress should hold more hearings | 19 | 3.94 |
The Congress should impeach Gonzales | 280 | 58.09 |
Total | 482 | 100.00 |
Question 108 (July 2007) Each July, this survey will be
offered, allowing us to track, over time, the political persuasion of our
visitors. Questions are asked about party affiliation as well as economic and
social ranking on a scale of 1 to 9 (1 being very conservative and 9 being very
liberal).
Response | Count | Percentage | Avg Econ | Avg Soc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other Parties | 10 | 1.50 | — | — |
No Party | 1 | 0.15 | — | — |
Communist Party | 6 | 0.90 | 8.33 | 7.00 |
Constitution Party | 27 | 4.05 | 3.59 | 3.37 |
Democratic Party | 174 | 26.13 | 6.32 | 7.51 |
Green Party | 23 | 3.45 | 5.74 | 7.78 |
Independent | 140 | 21.02 | 4.68 | 5.86 |
Libertarian | 86 | 12.91 | 2.62 | 5.81 |
Liberty Union | 1 | 0.15 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
Natural Law | 1 | 0.15 | 3.00 | 2.00 |
Reform Party | 2 | 0.30 | 4.00 | 8.50 |
Republican Party | 182 | 27.33 | 2.47 | 2.80 |
Socialist Party | 13 | 1.95 | 7.69 | 8.38 |
Total | 666 | 100.00 | 4.32 | 5.47 |
Notable “Other” parties: Ethical, American, Anarchist, Orange
Economics ranking:
Response | Count | Percentage | Grouped |
---|---|---|---|
1 = Very Conservative | 126 | 18.92 | 44.44 |
2 | 81 | 12.16 | |
3 | 89 | 13.36 | |
4 | 47 | 7.06 | 29.43 |
5 = Moderate | 117 | 17.57 | |
6 | 32 | 4.80 | |
7 | 91 | 13.66 | 26.12 |
8 | 29 | 4.35 | |
9 = Very Liberal | 54 | 8.11 |
Social ranking:
Response | Count | Percentage | Grouped |
---|---|---|---|
1 = Very Conservative | 99 | 14.86 | 31.98 |
2 | 65 | 9.76 | |
3 | 49 | 7.36 | |
4 | 41 | 6.16 | 21.62 |
5 = Moderate | 78 | 11.71 | |
6 | 25 | 3.75 | |
7 | 72 | 10.81 | 46.39 |
8 | 76 | 11.41 | |
9 = Very Liberal | 161 | 24.17 |
Question 107 (June 2007): The next major election is not
until November 2008 – but already, all parties are struggling to decide who to
put up for a candidate. This made us wonder – do you vote? And if not, why
not?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
I vote in almost every election I can, national, state, or local. |
216 | 86.06 |
I only vote in state elections. | 2 | 0.80 |
I only vote in national elections. | 5 | 1.99 |
I refuse to vote as a political statement. | 8 | 3.19 |
I don’t vote because it is inconvenient. | 2 | 0.80 |
I don’t vote because my vote does not matter. | 10 | 3.98 |
I’m too lazy to vote. | 8 | 3.19 |
Total | 251 | 100.00 |
Question 106, May 2007 In March, 36 Vermont towns voted to
request that the state’s congressional delegation start impeachment proceedings
against President Bush and Vice President Cheney. In April, the Vermont Senate
voted to request the same, and similar measures were being debated in other
states. U.S. Representative John Murtha mentioned impeachment as one option
available to the Congress. Impeachment – what do you think?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
There are absolutely no grounds for impeachment. Any calls for impeachment are pure politics. |
189 | 26.00 |
Though the people and states have the right to call for impeachment, there are many other things that can be done to check the power of the president, and calls for impeachment are premature. |
53 | 7.29 |
Impeachment is a valid tool to put pressure on the president to listen to the public. It should be used as leverage. |
88 | 12.10 |
Impeach now! | 397 | 54.61 |
Total | 727 | 100.00 |
Question 105, April 2007 What’s your opinion of the current
White House scandal surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and the
firings of United States Attorneys?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
The president has the right to fire any US Attorney for any reason at any time, and that should be the end of the discussion. |
231 | 41.92 |
Though US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, the conflicting statements coming from Gonzales and other Justice Department officials show the department is in serious turmoil, and the Congress is right to look into that. |
90 | 16.33 |
Whether the firings were legal or not, the way it was handled shows that Gonzales has no control over his own department – he should resign immediately. |
54 | 9.80 |
This is just another example of the incompetence of this administration. I can’t wait until January 20, 2009. |
176 | 31.94 |
Total | 551 | 100.00 |
Question 104, March 2007 The Supreme Court heard arguments
against the President’s Faith Based Charity Initiatives in February. The
plaintiffs argue that the diversion of taxpayer money to religious
organizations for charity outreach is an unconstitutional violation of the
Establishment Clause. The government did not try to defend the program, instead
arguing that taxpayers don’t have standing to sue. What do you think?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
The government should not pass any public funds to any religious organization under any circumstances. |
157 | 49.53 |
The government should not give any public funds to a religious organization that uses those funds to proselytise its message. |
50 | 15.77 |
If a religious organization can do a better job of social services than the government, we should support that. |
85 | 26.81 |
The government must support religious organizations to ensure the country’s collective soul is saved. |
25 | 7.89 |
Total | 317 | 100.00 |
Question 103, February 2007 The House quickly approved a
bill mandating a rise in the national minimum wage, but several proposals are
making their way through the Senate. What’s your opinion of the minimum
wage?
Response | Count | Percentage |
---|---|---|
There must be a federal minimum wage. | 234 | 46.89 |
The federal government should not set minimum wages, but the states should, if they choose to. |
83 | 16.63 |
The government should stay out of the minimum wage business. Wages are between employer and employee. |
182 | 36.47 |
Total | 499 | 100.00 |
Question 102, January 2007 At the end of December, 2006,
the Iraqi government executed Saddam Hussein for crimes against humanity. The
capture and prosecution of Hussein was one of the primary aims of the Iraq War.
Just a day later, news reports noted the 3000th American death in Iraq. Has it
been worth it?