CDC Participates in WHO Conference Despite Trump’s Executive Order

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently took part in a World Health Organization (WHO) conference, seemingly defying President Donald Trump’s executive order to halt U.S. communication with the WHO. This order aimed to:

• Hold the agency accountable for its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic
• Withdraw the U.S. from the organization
• Address financial concerns and alleged mismanagement of global health issues

The CDC’s participation was not publicly announced. A spokesperson informed Fox News about their involvement in the WHO’s biannual meeting on 2025-26 flu vaccines. It remains unclear whether the CDC received approval from the Trump administration for this engagement.

This situation follows Trump’s January order for the U.S. to withdraw from the WHO, though he later hinted at the possibility of rejoining if the organization improved its performance. Notably, Trump’s initial decision to exit the WHO in July 2020 was reversed by former President Joe Biden, illustrating the back-and-forth nature of U.S. involvement with the organization.

The Importance of CDC Participation in WHO Meetings

The CDC’s participation in WHO’s biannual vaccine meetings is crucial for global health. These meetings bring together experts to assess influenza data and guide vaccine development against emerging strains. For the United States, a constitutional republic committed to protecting its citizens’ health, this engagement ensures continued influence in global health discussions and access to shared knowledge and resources.

If the CDC were to fully withdraw from these meetings, it could lead to:

• Diminished U.S. influence over vaccine formulation
• Vaccines less suited to American epidemiological patterns
• Potential impact on the health of millions
• Increased vulnerability to preventable illnesses

Moreover, isolation from global health conversations could slow the country’s response to emerging public health threats. Engaging in WHO meetings facilitates information exchange about novel viruses and mutations, such as the H5N1 bird flu, which is essential for maintaining public health security.

While the executive order represents a shift in U.S. foreign policy, it’s important to consider its implications for American public health. How can the U.S. balance its sovereignty with the need for international cooperation in health matters? What measures can be taken to ensure the protection of Americans’ right to life and pursuit of happiness in the context of global health challenges?

Presidents As Kids!

Donald Trump – 45/47th President (2017-2020 / 2025-present)

Joe Biden – 46th President (2021-2024)

George W. Bush – 43rd President (2001–2009)

Jimmy Carter – 39th President (1977–1981)

Bill Clinton – 42nd President (1993–2001)

Gerald Ford – 38th President (1974–1977)

George H. W. Bush – 41st President (1989–1993)

John F. Kennedy – 35th President (1961–1963)

Lyndon B. Johnson – 36th President (1963–1969)

Richard Nixon – 37th President (1969–1974)

Barack Obama – 44th President (2009–2017)

Ronald Reagan – 40th President (1981–1989)

❮ ❯

Trump Administration’s Stance on WHO

The Trump administration’s critical stance on the World Health Organization (WHO) stems from several concerns:

1. Financial burden: Perceived disproportionate financial burden on the United States compared to other nations, particularly China.
2. Political entanglement: Alleged political entanglement of the WHO, especially with China.
3. COVID-19 response: Skepticism about the WHO’s actions during the early stages of the pandemic, criticizing its perceived lack of transparency and failures in handling the outbreak in Wuhan.

Trump’s indication of potential willingness to re-engage with the WHO, contingent on substantial reforms, reflects a strategic approach to international health diplomacy. This stance prioritizes organizational changes and increased impartiality as conditions for future U.S. involvement.

The withdrawal has implications beyond the WHO, affecting programs like the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The funding freeze implemented by the Trump administration raises questions about the continuity of critical global health initiatives.

"If that happens, people are going to die, and HIV will resurge," said Beatriz Grinsztejn, President of the International AIDS Society, regarding the potential impact of halting PEPFAR funding.

These decisions regarding WHO engagement and broader global health policies demonstrate an effort to recalibrate international commitments to align with national interests. How can the U.S. maintain its global health leadership while addressing perceived inefficiencies in international partnerships? What reforms might be necessary to ensure a more balanced and effective global health system?

1. Schemmel A. CDC appears to defy Trump’s executive order to withdraw US from WHO. Fox News. 2023.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Participation in WHO Vaccine Consultation Meeting. 2023.
3. Trump D. Executive Order on Withdrawing the United States from the World Health Organization. The White House. 2023.
4. Grinsztejn B. Statement on PEPFAR Funding Freeze. International AIDS Society. 2023.