 |
The Pocket Constitution
usconstitution.net has printed a special edition copy of The Constitution of the United States that has been proofed word for word against the original Constitution housed in the Archives in Washington, D.C. It is identical in spelling, capitalization and punctuation. This 48 page Pocket Constitution also includes the Bill of Rights, Amendments 11-27, The Declaration of Independence, and a complete index of the Constitution.
Item Number: 202
Size: 3.25 X 6 while closed
Now only 4.99 which INCLUDES shipping and handling!
|
|
Constitutional FAQ Answer #110
<<Previous Question |
Question Index |
Subject Index |
Constitutional Index |
Next Question>>
Q110. "Does the President have the authority to
cancel the 1972 ABM treaty without the advise and consent of the senate? The
power is given to the President to make treaties with the advise and consent of
the Senate. I would think he does not have unilateral power to void a
treaty."
A. There is some debate on the answer to this question, mostly because just
about every conceivable route has been taken. The Constitution does not address
the issue directly, so the question is, can we infer what the Constitution
would say about breaking treaties? The first argument is in your question
— that the President makes treaties, but the Senate must ratify them, so
it must be that both the Senate and the President must agree to break the
treaty. However, the President is head of state, and as such has responsibility
for conducting foreign relations, and should have the ability alone. Lastly,
since breaking a treaty can cause a major international incident, and even
result in war, a final argument says that Congress as a whole must request the
breaking of a treaty.
All of these methods have been used. Congress has unilaterally broken
treaties, the President has unilaterally broken treaties, the Senate and the
President have joined forces to break treaties, and the Congress has requested
that the President break treaties — and in some cases, the President has
refused. The safest way, meaning the way least likely to be challenged in
court, is for the President and Congress to agree that a treaty needs to be
broken and to do it together. Any other way invites controversy, though often
times such controversy is unavoidable.
For a comprehensive look at how treaties have been broken over the
centuries, refer to the Government Printing Office's page on The
Executive, and look for "Termination of Treaties by Notice."
URL: http://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q110.html
